Reddit query finder
Enter a topic. The tool searches Google twice, collects the Reddit threads it finds, and reads the titles and questions to show how people discuss the topic and what to write about it.
credit cost
4
Overview
What it does
What does the Reddit query finder do?
It shows you how a topic is discussed on Reddit and whether Google is surfacing Reddit for it. You enter a topic and a country. The tool runs two Google searches, one for the topic and one for the topic plus the word “reddit”, then keeps the Reddit threads it finds. It groups them by subreddit, pulls out the questions in the titles and in People also ask, and writes a short analysis of how people phrase the topic, the themes that repeat, and the content angles worth covering.
What do you enter?
Topic. What people would search, up to 80 characters. Search operators and quotes are removed.
Country. United States, United Kingdom, Canada, or Australia. Searches run in English on desktop results.
What do you get back?
Reddit on this search. Whether Reddit appears on page one for the topic itself, at which positions, and whether Google shows a discussions and forums block.
Subreddits. Each subreddit found and how many threads came from it.
Threads. Each thread title with a link that opens Reddit in a new tab, its subreddit, and which search found it.
Questions people ask. Thread titles phrased as questions, plus People also ask questions from the results page.
What this says. Five short sections: where Reddit shows up, how people phrase the topic, recurring themes, content angles, and which three threads to read first.
Copy as markdown. The full result in one click.
What does it not do?
It does not read the threads. The analysis works from titles and questions only, so it never reports what commenters said or what the consensus is.
It does not show upvotes, comment counts, post dates, traffic, or search volume.
A position is a page-one ranking only when the thread was found by the topic search. For threads found by the topic plus “reddit” search, the number is the order in that search, not a ranking for your topic.
How many credits does a run cost?
A run costs 4 credits and makes two searches.
If fewer than three Reddit threads come back, the tool skips the analysis, says so, and returns 2 credits.
If a search fails or times out, the run costs nothing.
A free account includes 10 credits a month. Pro includes 500.
Access
Free and Pro
Free
10 credits a month. Every tool, full output.
Pro
500 credits a month and run history.
Method
How it works
1. Enter a topic
Type what people would search, and pick a country.
2. The tool searches Google twice
Once for the topic, once for the topic plus the word “reddit”. It keeps the Reddit threads it finds.
3. Read the tables
Which subreddits the threads sit in, the thread titles, and the questions people ask.
4. Read the analysis
How people phrase the topic, the themes that repeat, content angles, and which three threads to open first.
Example
Sample output
Topic: aeo optimization · Country: US
Reddit on page one: Yes (position 1) · Discussions and forums block: No · Threads found: 8
Top subreddits
Subreddit | Threads |
|---|---|
r/seogrowth | 3 |
r/aeo | 2 |
r/localseo | 2 |
Recurring themes
Definition confusion — people genuinely want to know what AEO is and whether it's a distinct thing from SEO, not an assumed baseline.
Skepticism about substance — repeated language questioning whether real frameworks or tactics exist versus vague advice.
SEO's future — whether AEO signals SEO is being replaced or absorbed, rather than treated as a complementary practice.
Tooling — people are actively asking what tools exist to do this work, implying the tooling landscape isn't obvious or settled yet.
Content angles
A plain-language “what AEO actually is” piece that draws a clear line against traditional SEO — serves the large chunk of searchers still at the definitional stage.
A tactical, no-fluff framework post that names specific steps rather than generic advice — serves practitioners already annoyed by vague AEO content.
A “is AEO replacing SEO” piece that takes a clear position instead of hedging — serves people trying to decide whether to reallocate time and budget.
A tools roundup or comparison for AEO-specific work — serves people who've accepted AEO is real and now need to execute.
A skeptic's take addressing why so much AEO advice feels hollow, and what's actually verifiable — serves experienced SEOs wary of hype cycles.
FAQ